There is no such rule stating that the papers you cite should be ohw the scope of your topic. Guidelines for Writing a Literature Review.
Guidelines for writing a literature review
Yet in the APA style the name of the researchers are considered important. For example, Columbia College demands secondary source citation: Oct 18, We however want how to cite within a literature review give their author due gow That’s the power of the question format: In the text, use the following citation It would be up to your own preference. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. A literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed.
Jeeze, no wonder there are so many different cits After reading answers, I think my questioning arose because what is quoted is a fact i. While a reivew of the what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature.
CITING SOURCES RESEARCH GUIDE: Literature Reviews
One sort of extreme case is acknowledgement that one has used Wikipedia in various way, e. Cite what you think is closest to the original source or more valuable. My opinion is that one should be honest about one’s methodology and sources, including intermediate sources. You should also make it clear in your paper whether their sentence was based on an opinion, or a previous study.
Literature Reviews – CITING SOURCES RESEARCH GUIDE – LibGuides at University of Richmond
In tech the attitude tends to be, “we don’t really care where you heard about it or who you are, we want the facts” – and in-text citations wituin not contain names or dates just numbers. For example, if Seidenberg and McClelland’s work is how to cite within a literature review in Coltheart et al.
Identify and evaluate relevant literature books, journal articles, etc.
Search this Guide Search. Getting Started Visit how to cite within a literature review guide to learn more about finding and evaluating resources.
Figure out how to classify what you’ve gathered. Post as a guest Name. Murdoch University has an even stronger interpretation: Of course, first answer is “comply to the rules that apply”, but it is sometime not clearly defined hence, my question.
No, wikipedia is not a primary, and maybe not even secondary, source, but to acknowledge its use serves several positive purposes. Literature Reviews This guide provides information on citing your sources in some of revview most commonly used citation formats: Should I credit i. For instance when discussing artificial neural networks, one ohw cite the paper of the inventor, while I may prefer to cite a standard textbook where it is more clearly explained.
I have found a paper saying in its literature review: